Political economy debates have focused on the internationalisation of private capital, but foreign states increasingly enter domestic markets as financial investors. How do policy makers in recipient countries react? Do they treat purchases as a threat and impose restrictions or see them as beneficial and welcome them? What are the wider implications for debates about state capacities to govern domestic economies in the face of internationalisation of financial markets?
In response, Foreign States in Domestic Markets have developed the concept of ‘internationalised statism’, where governments welcome the use of foreign state investments to govern their domestic economies. These foreign state investments are applied to the most prominent overseas state investors, Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs). Many SWFs are from Asia and the Middle East and their number and size have greatly expanded, reaching $9 trillion by 2020.
This book examines policies towards non-Western SWFs buying company shares in four countries: the US, UK, France, and Germany. Although the US has imposed significant legal restrictions, the others have pursued internationalised statism in ways that are surprising given both popular and political economy classifications. This book argues that the policy patterns found are related to domestic politics, notably the preferences and capacities of the political executive and legislature, rather than solely economic needs or national security risks.
The phenomenon of internationalised statism underlines that overseas state investment provides policy makers in recipient states with new allies and resources. The study of SWFs shows that internationalisation and liberalisation of financial markets offer national policy makers opportunities to govern their domestic economies.
The theoretical chapter is available here. You can buy the book in Oxford University Press , Waterstones , Amazon , Oxford Scholarship Online.
“This book is a “must” for scholars of International Political Economy and Comparative Political Economy. It is impressive in terms of analytical rigor, breath of empirical coverage and importance of the findings and how they contribute to the existing literature.”
Quaglia, L. (2022) Book review of “Foreign states in domestic markets: Sovereign wealth funds and the West. Thatcher, Mark and Vlandas, Tim, Oxford University Press, 2021.” Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12489
“The four case studies in this book offer basic data and succinct analysis of recent policies on this issue—which is sure to loom large as Western democracies ponder how to respond to the rising geoeconomic power of their global competitors.”
Moravcsik, A. (2022) Book review of “Foreign states in domestic markets: Sovereign wealth funds and the West. Thatcher, Mark and Vlandas, Tim, Oxford University Press, 2021.” Foreign Affairs, November/December 2022.
“Taking forward the internationalized statism concept, Thatcher and Vlandas reiterate the significance of domestic politics and institutional setting in shaping international economic relations.”…”This book, in sum, has much to offer for a range of discussions in political science and beyond.”
Dixon, A. (2022) Book review of “Foreign states in domestic markets: Sovereign wealth funds and the West. Thatcher, Mark and Vlandas, Tim, Oxford University Press, 2021.” Perspectives on Politics,20(4), 1509-1510.
“Few studies examine how a state seeks to attract investment from other states, or how it directs foreign state investment within its domestic markets. To fill this gap, Mark Thatcher and Tim Vlandas develop the concept of ‘internationalized statism’ in Foreign states in domestic markets. They evaluate the degree to which France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States shape their domestic economic policies in response to potential investment from Middle Eastern and Asian sovereign wealth funds (SWFs).”
Mott, C. (2023) Book review of “Foreign states in domestic markets: Sovereign wealth funds and the West. Thatcher, Mark and Vlandas, Tim, Oxford University Press, 2021.” International Affairs, 99(3): 1334–1335.
You must be logged in to post a comment.